What Is Big Tech Censorship?

Big Tech Censorship is the suppression of information or ideas that are considered threatening or dangerous by the government or media.

Checkout this video:


Today, Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter enjoy an unprecedented level of power and influence. They control the flow of information for billions of people around the world and have become some of the most powerful gatekeepers in history.

While these companies insist that they are impartial platforms that simply provide a space for others to share their views, there is a growing body of evidence that they are actively manipulating what users see and limiting exposure to certain ideas and opinions that they disagrees with. This is known as censorship.

Big Tech censorship can take many forms, but it generally involve manipulating algorithms, suspending or banning users, and de-platforming entire organizations. These activities have a chilling effect on free expression and open debate, and they are often carried out in secret with little or no transparency.

Big Tech companies have justified their censorship by claiming that it is necessary to protect users from hate speech, fake news, and other harmful content. However, there is reason to believe that these claims are often used as a pretext to silence legitimate speech that Big Tech companies simply don’t like.

This problem is only likely to get worse in the years ahead as Big Tech companies continue to grow in size and power. It’s important for everyone who cares about freedom of expression to understand what’s happening and take action to protect our rights.

What is Big Tech Censorship?

Big Tech Censorship is the act of suppressing information or voices by Big Tech companies. This can include hiding information from search results, de-platforming users, or shadow-banning them. Big Tech companies have a lot of power and they can use it to censor information that they don’t want you to see.

The Definition of Censorship

Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, politically incorrect or “inconvenient.” Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions, and other bodies.

The History of Censorship

The history of censorship is a long and varied one, with examples dating back to ancient times. One of the earliest examples comes from 4th century BCE Greece, where Socrates was put on trial and sentenced to death for his “corrupting” the youth of Athens with his teachings. In more recent years, censorship has been used as a tool by governments to control the flow of information and stifle dissent. During World War II, for example, the Nazi regime in Germany heavily censored the media, banning any content that was critical of the government or that could be seen as aiding the enemy.

In the United States, censorship is often thought of as an infringement on First Amendment rights, such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press. However, the U.S. government has censor certain types of speech and expression in certain situations. For example, during wartime, the government may censor information that could aid the enemy or hurt morale. In schools, there is a limited amount of censorship that is allowed in order to maintain a safe and positive learning environment.

Big tech companies have also been known to engage in censorship, either voluntarily or under pressure from governments. In China, for example, Google has complied with government demands to censor search results and block certain websites. In 2018, Facebook came under fire for censoring a number of conservative outlets and individuals, leading many to accuse the company of having a political bias.

The Impact of Censorship

Censorship has always been a controversial issue, but it has taken on new urgency in the age of the internet and social media. Big tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter have come under fire for censoring content that they deem inappropriate or offensive. This has led to accusations of censorship from both the left and the right.

The impact of censorship can be far-reaching. It can stifle free expression and open debate, and it can prevent people from accessing information that they need. It can also lead to self-censorship, as people avoid posting certain things for fear of being censored.

Big tech companies are not the only ones censoring content. Governments around the world are also increasingly using censorious tactics to control what their citizens can see and say online. In some cases, this has led to outright bans on certain websites or social media platforms.

There is no easy solution to the problem of censorship. But it is important to be aware of the issue and to stand up for free speech in the face of attempts to silence it.

Who Decides What Is Censored?

Big tech censorship is the act of social media platforms removing content that they deem to be inappropriate. This can include posts that are considered to be hateful, offensive, or misleading. But who decides what is censored?

The Government

The government is the entity that ultimately decides what content is censored in the United States. However, the government does not censor content directly. Instead, it relies on private companies, like Facebook and YouTube, to censor content on its behalf.

The government has a few different methods of pressuring private companies to censor content. The most common method is through the use of lyrics site regulations. The government can also pressure companies to censor content by threatening to sue them or by publicly shaming them.

Big tech censorship has been a controversial issue in recent years. Some people believe that private companies should be allowed to decide what content to censor, while others believe that the government should be more involved in regulating what content is censored.

Big Tech Companies

It’s no secret that big tech companies have a lot of power. They control what we see and don’t see on the internet, they have a huge influence over the media, and they can even censor what we say. But who decides what is censored?

The answer is complicated. There are a number of factors that go into decisions about censorship, and there is no one person or organization that makes the final call. That said, there are some general principles that guide these decisions.

First and foremost, censorship decisions are made to protect people from harm. This includes physical harm, but also emotional or psychological harm. That’s why content that is violent, graphic, or otherwise disturbing is often censored. It’s also why hate speech and bigotry are often censored.

Another key consideration is compliance with laws and regulations. Companies can be fined or even shut down if they violate certain laws, so it’s important for them to ensure that their content complies with all applicable laws.

Finally, companies also consider their own internal policies when making censorship decisions. For example, a company might decide to allow certain types of content on its platform but not others. This is a decision that each company makes on its own, based on its own values and goals.

Why Is Big Tech Censorship a Problem?

Big tech censorship is a problem because it allows big tech companies to control what we see and don’t see online. This censorship can be used to silence dissent and stifle free speech. It can also be used to manipulate public opinion by censoring information that big tech companies don’t want us to see.

It Violates the First Amendment

It is no secret that Big Tech companies like Google, Facebook, and Twitter have been censoring conservative voices on their platforms. While these companies claim to be neutral, it is clear that they are biased against conservatives. This censorship violates the First Amendment, which guarantees Americans the right to free speech.

Big Tech censorship is a problem because it silences conservative voices and viewpoint. This censorship has a chilling effect on free speech and open dialogue. It also allows these companies to control the narrative and shape public opinion. This is dangerous for our democracy.

We must hold Big Tech accountable for their censorship and ensure that conservative voices are heard.

It hurts small businesses

When big tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Twitter censor content, it disproportionately hurts small businesses.

These big tech companies have a monopoly on online traffic. They control what content people see – and don’t see – online. So, when they censor content, it can have a major impact on small businesses that rely on online traffic to survive.

For example, let’s say you run a small business that sells products or services that are critical of the government. If Facebook censors your content, it will prevent your target audience from seeing it. This will likely lead to a decrease in sales and could ultimately force your business to close its doors.

Big tech censorship also hurts small businesses in another way. When big tech companies censor content, it often takes the form of “Shadow Banning.” This is when a platform decreases the visibility of a user’s content without their knowledge.

If you’re a small business owner who uses social media to connect with customers and promote your products or services, shadow banning could prevent your target audience from seeing your content. This would make it difficult for you to generate leads and grow your business.

In short, big tech censorship is bad for small businesses. It stifles competition and prevents customers from finding the products or services they need.

How Can We Stop Big Tech Censorship?

Big tech censorship is the act of tech giants like Google, Facebook, and Twitter silencing voices they don’t agree with. This has become a big problem because these companies have a monopoly on the flow of information. We need to find a way to stop big tech censorship.


In order to effectively stop big tech censorship, regulation is necessary. There are a few ways this could be accomplished.

One way would be for the government to step in and regulate these companies directly. This would involve creating rules and regulations that these companies would have to follow in order to operate in the United States. This would likely be a difficult process, as it would require agreement from both Republicans and Democrats in Congress. It would also be opposed by the companies themselves, who would likely argue that it would stifle innovation.

Another way to stop big tech censorship would be to create regulations that apply specifically to social media companies. These rules could relate to things like what content can be censored, how users can appeal censorship decisions, and so on. These regulations could be created by the government or by independent organizations such as the EFF.

Yet another possibility is for the government to get rid of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This law currently gives social media companies immunity from liability for the content that users post on their platforms. Without this immunity, social media companies would be much more careful about what content they allow on their platforms, for fear of being sued.

All of these optionswould have pros and cons, and it’s not clear which (if any) would ultimately be successful in stopping big tech censorship. What is clear is that something needs to be done about this issue, as censoring lawful speech is a danger to democracy itself.


There is a growing movement to regulate the tech industry with regards to censorship. In the US, there have been a number of bills introduced in Congress that would specifically target tech companies for their censorship practices. One such bill is the Stop Online Censorship Act, which was introduced in the Senate in 2019. This bill would make it illegal for tech companies to censor lawful speech on their platforms. In addition, a number of state legislatures have also introduced similar bills. For example, in Florida, a bill was introduced in 2019 that would make it illegal for social media platforms to censor political speech.

antitrust action

Large technology companies have been criticized for engaging in censorship, which is the suppression of information or ideas that are considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or inconvenient as determined by those in power.

The big tech companies have been accused of censoring conservative voices, shadow banning, and using their algorithms to control what people see. They have also been accused of manipulating search results to favors their own products and services.

Critics say that this censorship is a form of control that these large companies have over the flow of information and ideas, and that it unfairly advantages their own products and services.

There are calls for antitrust action to be taken against the big tech companies, as well as for new regulations to be put in place to control their power.

Scroll to Top